The Mirror and The Times
- Mastering Media

- Jan 12
- 2 min read
The Daily Mirror and The Times represent the two distinct poles of the British newspaper industry, serving as key case studies for the "tabloid" and "quality" sectors respectively.
The Daily Mirror is a national red top tabloid with a traditional left-wing political stance, consistently supporting the Labour Party. Owned by Reach plc, it targets a predominantly C2DE (working-class) audience over the age of 35. Its media language is image-led, utilizing dramatic, emotive headlines like "Zero Shame" and colloquialisms such as "cops" and "lockdown bashes" to create an "us vs. them" narrative. In the "Partygate" edition of February 1, 2022, the Mirror vilified the government by juxtaposing images of a smirking Boris Johnson with a hospital ward to highlight social inequalities.
Conversely, The Times is a quality broadsheet owned by News UK, a subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. It targets a well-educated ABC1 demographic seeking detailed analysis and authoritative reporting. While it maintains a right-wing allegiance, it adopts a more neutral, balanced mode of address. Its media language is text-led, using formal headlines such as "Police investigate PM’s four lockdown parties". Its criticism of the government is implicit; for example, it selected a close-up photo of the Prime Minister showing "trepidation" to suggest he had questions to answer without taking an overt political stance.
Industrially, both papers are navigating falling print sales by diversifying into digital platforms. While the Mirror offers "bitesize" content to maintain its "Intelligent Tabloid" brand, The Times uses a paywall to secure income from its affluent readership. Both are regulated by IPSO, an independent body funded by the industry.
Analogy: If a major news event is a court case, the Daily Mirror acts like a passionate prosecutor speaking directly to the jury’s emotions, while The Times acts like a court reporter, providing a dense, factual transcript for the judge to review.


Comments